Page 67 - ClearGov | Documents
P. 67
FY 2025
Adopted
FY 2025 FY 2026
FY 2024 FY 2025 Budget vs. FY
Category Adopted Proposed
Actuals Projected 2026 Proposed
Budget Budget
Budget (%
Change)
Personnel Ser vices $135,062 $133,833 $140,179 $136,187 1.76%
Contractual Ser vices $42,443 $40,547 $38,720 $32,547 -19.73%
Supplies $689 $1,485 $538 $1,585 6.73%
Total Storm Water $178,194 $175,865 $179,437 $170,319 -3.15%
Drainage
Personnel Ser vices $396,822 $438,654 $375,612 $463,866 5.75%
Contractual Ser vices $74,770 $65,632 $65,940 $77,185 17.60%
Supplies $55,540 $43,628 $76,180 $44,278 1.49%
Capital Outlay - - $1,851 - -
Transfer to Other Funds $770,477 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,200,000 20.00%
Total Drainage $1,297,609 $1,547,914 $1,519,583 $1,785,329 15.34%
Non-Depar tmental
Contractual Ser vices $6,261 $7,278 $6,092 $7,278 0.00%
Supplies - $200 - $200 0.00%
Total Non-Depar tmental $6,261 $7,478 $6,092 $7,478 0.00%
Total Expenditures $1,512,797 $1,761,805 $1,737,717 $1,994,787 13.22%
The expenditures for the Drainage Fund are split between operational expenses and transfers to the capital side, with a
growing focus on building up reser ves for large capital projects. For FY 2026 , the major changes in expenditures re|ect
similar trends seen in the General and Utility Funds, including personnel cost adjustments, rising utility costs, and
increased transfers to fund capital improvements.
Personnel Ser vices:
Personnel costs in the Drainage Fund have increased due to the 3.5% merit-based pay adjustment and rising health and
dental insurance premiums, consistent with other funds. Staf{ng levels remain unchanged, with employees dedicated to
maintaining and improving the drainage system.
Contrac tual Ser vices:
Though less prominent in the Drainage Fund compared to other funds, contractual ser vices have seen some general
in|ation- driven increases. These ser vices suppor t maintenance and smaller drainage projects as needed.
Supplies:
Rising utility costs, driven by in|ation, have also impacted the Drainage Fund. These increases are primarily related to the
energy and materials required to maintain the City ’s drainage infrastructure. In|ationary pressures have affected the
overall cost of supplies needed for system upkeep and smaller projects.
Capital Transfers:
More than half of the Drainage Fund’s expenditures are allocated toward transfers to the capital side of the fund. These
transfers have been intentionally increased as par t of the City ’s long- term strategy to build suf{cient reser ves for large -
scale capital improvements. These funds will be used to address the City ’s aging drainage infrastructure and to tackle
signi{cant capital projects in line with the multi-year drainage plan.
While capital projects are the primary focus of the Drainage Fund, the operating side continues to suppor t day- to - day
maintenance and smaller-scale improvements to ensure the system remains reliable.
FY 2025-2026 Annual Budget | Colleyville Page 67

