Page 429 - Hurst FY19 Approved Budget
P. 429

Debt Service Fund Summary





                                                      Moody’s Investor        Standard &
                                                           Services              Poors
                       General Obligation Bonds              Aa2                  AA
                       Water & Sewer Obligations             Aa2                  AA
                       Half Cent Sales Tax Bonds             Aa3                  AA


                       Debt Management


                       The Hurst Charter sets a limitation on the maximum total tax rate at $1.50 per $100
                       of valuation.  Any increase in the debt component will decrease the funds available
                       for maintenance and operations.  Currently, one cent on the tax rate generates
                       approximately $220,000 in revenue equating to $33 million at the City’s maximum tax
                       rate.


                       Several factors influence debt management, such as property values, the tax rate, the
                       amount of debt, and the timing of issuance. In fiscal year 1997-1998, property value
                       increase of about $34.4 million dollars decreased the debt rate from $0.129541 to
                       $0.12951.  For fiscal years 1999 and 2000, the debt ratio continued to decline, with
                       increases in property values of $58.7 million and $80.4 million offsetting a reduction in
                       the tax rate and the issuance of bonds in both years.  For the 2000-01 budget year, the
                       City’s bonded indebtedness rose; however, the debt rate decreased to $0.112334 due to
                       a $176 million increase in total taxable value. The most dramatic value increase occurred
                       for fiscal year 2001-02.  The debt rate decreased from $0.112334 to $0.11045 because
                       of a $254 million increase in property values; however, the annual principal and interest
                       payments increased by $221,835 or 13.4% over the previous year.  The debt issuance
                       that year conservatively utilized funds that could have been used for the General Fund
                       operating budget.  The property tax rate also decreased by one cent, which limited the
                       funds available for the General Fund.  A conservative approach in debt management
                       will continue to be used in future years.  Property values declined during the recent
                       recession, but they have stabilized over the past two years. Over the last decade debt
                       rate increases have been associated with the issuance of voter-approved  debt. Voters’
                       approval of an $11.7 million bond election in 2005 resulted in a tax rate increase of
                       3.6 cents.  Debt proceeds were used to construct a new fire station and senior center.
                       Street/Drainage  and  Library improvements were  also  included  in the  2005 bond
                       election. In May 2012, voters also approved a $16.5 million General Bond Election for
                       the construction of a new Justice Center and related parking area.  The issuance of this
                       debt resulted in a tax rate increase of 3 cents.  Savings associated with several bond







                                                             412
   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434