Page 20 - NRH FY20 Approved Budget
P. 20

primarily due to increased treatment costs, but also related to the cost of replacing a large trunk
               main that carries wastewater from NRH to the treatment plant in Fort Worth.

               With the exception of last summer, consumption levels have remained lower since 2012 when
               local and regional conservation efforts      began.    Increased public education has       informed
               customers on how to water more efficiently and minimize consumption.  In addition, the rising
               cost of water has caused some customers to reduce their consumption.

               One of   the  weaknesses   of  the Utility  Fund rate structure is that  it  relies too heavily  on high
               consumption years to provide income that will cover periods of low consumption.  In looking at
               our water rate structure we have discovered that our Base Rate does not even cover the City’s
               direct cost for the 2,000 gallons of water that are included in the Base Rate, let alone cover fixed
               costs such as metering and billing.  In FY 2018/2019 we raised the Water Base Rate by $2, from
               $10 to $12 per month.  For FY 2019/2020 we are recommending an increase in the Water Base
               Rate   by   another   $5.50.   Comparisons     with   other  area   cities  reveals  that  our  Base
               Rate is significantly below market and this change will place our base rate charge in market.
               Without modifying our rate structure, we will continue to be too heavily dependent on years
               where   there  is  high  water  consumption  in  order  to  keep  the  Utility  Fund  in  the  black  on  a
               regular basis.

               The Sewer Base Rate is also below average for area cities and was increased by $2 per
               month to help capture more of the city's fixed costs.




               Crime Control District Fund


               As discussed in the General Fund, the lack of growth in sales          tax revenues is   limiting the
               programs that can be funded through the Crime Control District (CCD).  If this trend continues
               in the future it will be necessary to either increase the   General Fund subsidy or shift various
               programs from the CCD over to the General Fund.




               Parks and Recreation Facilities Development Fund


               The Parks and Recreation Facilities Development Fund receives the majority of revenues from
               the half cent sales tax for parks and recreation facilities approved by NRH voters in 1991. Other
               major revenue sources to the fund include NRH Centre and Grand Hall revenues, tennis center
               revenues, and revenue from park impact fees.

               As previously mentioned, sales tax revenue is relatively flat, and this is reflected in adopted
               revenues from sales tax to the Park Development Fund of $5,199,346. NRH Centre revenues of
               $3,430,527 reflect a slight increase compared to the adopted budget as a result of increased
               rentals at the Grand Hall, increased revenues in recreation and aquatic programs, and a slight
               increase in revenues from memberships. An appropriation of sales tax reserves in this fund of
               $224,057 is also reflected in adopted revenues to cover parks capital project costs.


               Now that   the NRH   parks  and trails  system  is  built  out,  the cost  of  maintenance and  upkeep,





                                                             20
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25