Page 47 - Saginaw FY21 Annual Budget
P. 47

CITY OF SAGINAW
                                              5-YEAR FUND SUMMARY
                                                       2020 - 2021
            Explanation of Variances


            Note 1 - The $955,543 surplus in the General Fund is due to increased sales tax and the delay of an economic development incentive
            loan. There was a planned drawdown ($153,288) of fund balance in the Debt Service Fund. The $2,030,900 surplus in Capital Projects
            Fund is due to the issuance bonds and the construction delay for the Bailey Boswell Road project. One time capital purchases are
            funded with previous collections in the CCPD Fund, resulting in a deficit of $69,881. The $559,198 surplus in Drainage Utility reflects
            the $1 per month fee increase. Fund balances in future years will be used for drainage construction projects. The $168,378 surplus in
            the Street Maintenance Fund is due to increased sales tax and the delay of several street maintenance projects.The $298,180 increase
            in the Water/Wastewater Escrow Fund is due to increased collection of water impact fees as a result of increased construction activity.

            Note 2 - The $49,193 deficit in the General Fund is for one time capital purchases. There was a planned drawdown of fund balance in
            the Debt Service Fund. The $5,389,206 deficit in Capital Projects Fund is due to use of previously issued bonds for the construction of
            the Bailey Boswell Road project. The $515,747 surplus in Drainage Utility reflects actual collections. The fund balance in future years
            will be used for drainage construction projects. There was a surplus in the Street Maintenance Fund due to delay of the Burlington Road
            project. The $324,578 surplus in the General Escrow Fund is due to a developer contribution for the future improvements to Old
            Decatur Road, increased hotel/motel tax revenue, and unusually high year for insurance claims.  The $232,839 deficit in the
            Water/Wastewater Escrow Fund is a result of using previously collected water impact fees for the South Hampshire 16" waterline and
            the Saginaw Boulevard 12" water line phase 2 projects. The $505,349 surplus in the Enterprise Fund is due to strong water sales
            throughout the spring and summer, higher than average sewer surcharge revenue, and the delay of several planned capital projects.
            Note 3 - The $94,496 surplus in the Debt Service Fund is due to higher than anticipated property tax collections. The $209,687
            surplus in Capital Projects Fund reflects unspent tax note proceeds. The $47,410 deficit in the CCPD Fund was for the replacement of
            patrol vehicles. The $419,046 surplus the Drainage Fund is due to the delay of the East Cement Creek Drainage project. The suprlus
            of $111,139 surplus in the Street Maintenance Fund relfects the delay of the Burlington Road project. The $104,520 surplus in the
            Donations Fund reflects increased donations for the Train & Grain Festival, the delay of the Beautification Plan update and savings in
            the Ardent Mills mural. The $124,952 surplus in the General Escrow Fund reflects a developer contribution for future improvements to
            Old Decatur Road. There was a $219,222 surplus in the Enterprise Escrow Fund due to the collection of water impact fees that will be
            used for eligible projects in future years. The planned $1,409,093 surplus in the Enterprise Fund is due to the delay of several
            budgeted projects: projects to prevent inflow and infiltration of the wastewater system, design for the Saginaw Boulevard 16" water line
            phase 2, the construction of the Fairmont sewer rehabilitation phase 1, and the relocation of utilities along FM 156 in preparation of the
            Texas Department of Transportation road project.

            Note 4 - The $601,715 surplus in the General Fund is due to strong sales tax, buidling fee, and utility franchise fee collections. Cost
            saving measures were taken to manage the impact of COVID-19 on City operations. The General Fund also received federal CARES
            Act funding through Tarrant County to offset increased exepnditures resulting from the pandemic. The $138,535 deficit in the Debt
            Service Fund is for the cost to issue Certificates of Obligations and lower than budgeted property tax collections due to increased
            exemptions granted by Tarrant Appraisal District. The $14,694,570 increase in the Capital Projects Fund is due to the issuance of
            Certificated of Obligation for future capital projects partially offset by expenditures for the Bailey Boswell Road and Overpass project.
            The $52,270 surplus in the CCPD Fund is due to strong sales tax collections. The 174,965 deficit in the Drainage Utility Fund is due to
            beginning the East Cement Creek Drainage project, the replacement of capital equipment and payment of a developers agreement
            carried forward from the previous year. The $804,285 drawdown in the Street Maintenance Fund is for the East McLeroy curb and
            gutter project, the completion of Knowles Drive conceptual plan, and the reconstruction of Anderson Street. The $61,485 surplus in the
            Donations Fund is due to donations exceeding planned expenditures for both Parks and Library. Many library programs were cancelled
            or modified due to the pandemic. The $40,470 surplus in the General Escrow Fund is due to the transfer from the General Fund for
            future equipment replacement. There $71,745 increase in the Enterprise Escrow Fund is due the collection of water impact fees that
            will be used for eligible projects in future years. The $2,266,465 drawdown of the Enterprise Fund is for capital projects to remedy
            inflow and infiltration of the wastewater system, FM 156 utility relocations, construction of the Fairmont sewer rehabilitation phase 1,
            and the relocation of utilities along the BNSF train tracks.















                                                             47
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52