Page 24 - Hurst Budget FY21
P. 24

sales).  As such, local taxing units, not the state, can lose tax revenues under a scenario where taxable
              sales delivered out of a taxing unit’s jurisdiction exceeds the value of taxable sales delivered into their
              jurisdiction.  Recent decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court now allows states to require online retailers
              to collect sales tax but his has not had a significant impact on our sales tax revenue.  Additional actions
              by the Texas Comptroller related to online  sales have prompted a significant discussion on
              consummation of a purchase and of those sales tax dollars will be allocated to the origin or the
              destination of the online purchase.  The Comptroller made a final ruling on the issue that will be effective
              October 1, 2021 with the express intent to allow for interested parties to seek a legislative change
              during the 2021 session.  As it currently stands, the ruling would likely be favorable to the City of Hurst;
              however, legislative changes could overrule the Comptrollers position on the issue.

              LONG TERM FOCUS

              Multi-Year Financial Overview

              The Multi-Year Overview is an essential component of each year's budget process.  Expenditures are
              projected at an estimated growth rate, and funding strategies are developed to provide for this growth.
              Potential revenue sources, cost-saving strategies, and debt issuance are considered before property
              tax rate changes or utility rate changes are factored into the plan to balance the projected budgets.
              Excerpts from the Multi-Year Financial Overview, and the five-year summary of the long-term plan, are
              located in  the Long Term Strategic Planning  Section of this document. The Multi-Year Financial
              Overview is presented to the City Council in July or August prior to budget workshops held each year;
              however, the pandemic altered those plans resulting in an abbreviated session with the Council during
              our annual budget workshop.  The uncertainty and ever changing nature of the impact of the pandemic
              underscores the inherent weakness in multi-year planning; however, the city remains committed to
              considering the future impact of current revenue and expenditure decisions, inclusive of the current
              conditions associated with the existing pandemic.


              Capital Improvements Program

              An important aspect of long term  planning is  the Capital Improvements Program  (CIP). The  CIP
              identifies existing and future needs, funding sources and project maintenance and operation costs.
              The goal of the CIP is to identify and plan for future capital programs and to estimate financial impacts.
              The plan is comprised of a listing of funded capital project needs that are identified by each operating
              department. The projects are prioritized and ranked, taking into consideration the timing and immediate
              needs of the projects.  For more information, please see the CIP section of this document.

              A funding source that addresses long-term capital project needs for the General Fund is the Debt
              Service Fund, which  pays principal and interest payments on General Obligation bonds and
              Certificates of Obligation.  From 1987 to 1994, the city chose not to issue bonds because any new
              issue would require an increase in the debt component of the property tax rate.  For the ten years prior
              to 2006, the city was able to issue additional debt without raising the tax rate because of increasing
              property values. However, community-based needs for capital project funding changed the philosophy
              of no debt increases and the debt component of the property tax rate increased from $0.0886 in 2005-
              2006 to $0.129897 for the 2008-2009 fiscal year primarily due to voter-approved general obligation
              debt. The city has a strong history of proactive management of our outstanding debt. Each year we
              evaluate capital needs, refunding opportunities, and the market to ensure efficient use of debt. The city
              has issued voter approved debt for city facilities ranging from fire stations and the senior center to
              infrastructure projects for streets and drainage.  The debt rate peaked in 2012-2013 to just over $0.16
              to fund voter approved GO bonds for the construction of a parking garage and Justice Center. Recently


                                                              12
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29